You’re right. Here is the corrected post:
I came across a courtroom video that I could not stop watching.
A defendant stands before Judge Stevens facing third-degree felony charges for deadly conduct. He admitted to firing 51 rounds and reloading his weapon three times in a public area. Not once. Not twice. Three reloads. Fifty-one shots into a space where other people were present.
The court had a deal on the table. Ten years of deferred adjudication probation. For a first offense involving that level of recklessness, that is an extraordinary break. The judge even noted he had the discretion to cut it by a third and had done exactly that in other cases. This man was being handed an exit ramp.
He did not take it.
Instead of showing any awareness of how serious this was, the defendant got smart with the court. When Judge Stevens pressed him on why he fired 51 rounds into a public space, his response was essentially to redirect the question back at the person who shot at him first. No remorse. No acknowledgment of the danger he created for everyone around him. Just attitude and deflection.
Then he made it worse. He actually questioned why he was being given 10 years of probation at all, citing the fact that it was his first offense. As if firing 51 rounds into a public space and reloading three times should come with a lighter touch because he had never been in trouble before. He did not understand that the probation offer was the lighter touch. That was the favor. And he was standing in court arguing against it.
That is when Judge Stevens had seen enough.
The plea was pulled off the table on the spot. The judge told him the jury would decide his fate now, with up to 10 years in prison on the line. The public defender could be seen trying to walk him through the reality of what just happened. The court had been cutting him a break and he argued himself right out of it.
The part that stays with me is the entitlement. This was not someone who made a terrible decision and understood the weight of it. This was someone genuinely confused about why the system was inconveniencing him. Fifty-one rounds. Three reloads. People in that public space could have been killed.
Judge Stevens said it best. Are you watching movies?
No. This was real life. And the consequences just got a lot more real for him too.
Leave a Reply