Mental illness is real, we all know this. A person can act irrationally due to mental health challenges. That is a given. With that established, many would agree that individuals experiencing issues such as anger, rage, or impaired judgment should be carefully evaluated before having access to firearms. That seems like basic logic.
This raises the question of how Deion Duwane Patterson came to have access to a firearm. A brief search before writing this did not confirm whether he legally owned the gun or not. This piece is written on the premise that he was a legal gun owner. Given how media often covers illegal firearm cases, that angle may explain the lack of focus on illegal ownership in this particular situation.
Regardless of legal status, the point remains worth examining. Many people with mental health challenges legally carry firearms, and incidents involving loss of life continue to occur. Illegal firearms also play a role, which often connects back to varying gun laws across different states.
Growing up, there were individuals known to travel to states with more relaxed purchasing laws, acquire firearms, and resell them in other regions at a higher price. Their ability to operate depended heavily on how easily guns could be obtained. This pattern illustrates how regional gun laws can affect gun violence well beyond their own borders.
This is not about being against gun ownership. It is about responsible judgment. Someone dealing with documented anger issues or similar mental health concerns deserves proper support and evaluation rather than an approved carry permit.
Leave a Reply